Earlier today I received an email from Martin Robinson, Chief Executive of AOPA, threatening legal action for libel if the LAA's website notes on the consultation exercise for Training from Unlicensed Aerodromes was not removed by 6.00pm this evening and an apology placed.
I have removed the original notes and apologise for any misunderstanding or offence caused to AOPA. Indeed, as a GA pilot myself, I look to AOPA as a natural supporter and champion for the collective GA 'cause'. It is clear that AOPA do considerable work to protect the freedoms of the GA pilot and on behalf of the LAA I wish them well in their continued efforts.
On the issue of this particular consultation, it is also clear that the LAA and AOPA's approach are very different. Whilst training from licensed aerodromes only is not the norm within Europe generally, LAA would welcome the liberalisation that training from unlicensed aerodromes would bring. We ardently believe it would reduce costs, increase freedoms and generally be 'a good thing' for GA pilots.
There are many opinions being expressed within forums and 'on the flightline'. Suggesting that certain currently licensed aerodromes would suffer as a result of introducing training from unlicensed aerodromes might arguably be the case (although not likely in our opinion), however this is a natural position in a free and open domocratic market. Suggesting that NIMBYS might close down otherwise successful unlicensed aerodromes is again a red herring, since the existing planning laws are designed to ensure a fair and legal framework for all activities, including aviation. LAA believes that freedom of choice and reduced regulation are to be encouraged. Certainly on this issue. The LAA's formal response can be found here.
Peter Harvey
CEO, LAA 9th July 2008 16:30hr
©LAA
Site developed by LAA in conjunciton with itHomepage Ltd